Understanding how federal tax reform will affect your business has received much press and dialogue for the construction industry. However, local property tax reform changes have not received quite the press and interest that federal tax reform change has. Business owners are looking for places to turn for advice. The 2017-2019 State Budget, recently signed into law by Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, included a repeal of the personal property tax on all machinery. Job site equipment and shop machinery are now exempt for property tax filings effective Jan. 1, 2018.
What happened?
Prior to 2018, only machinery used in manufacturing was exempt from personal property tax in Wisconsin.
As the Wisconsin Legislature evaluated a change to personal property tax, the most impactful property reclassification that would still fit within the State Budget, was machinery. The State approved reform reclassifying all machinery, historically reported on Schedule C of the Wisconsin property tax return, as exempt property. The State intends to reimburse local municipalities for lost revenue from their historical Schedule C receipts.
What does this mean?
While limited in formal guidance for companies in Wisconsin, the State provided the following definition of machinery; “a structure or assemblage of parts that transmits forces, motion or energy from one part to another in a predetermined way by electrical, mechanical or chemical means.” (Wis. Stat. §70.111(27) (a).)
The Wisconsin Department of Revenue has published the updated Form PA-003 to report personal property tax for 2018 and beyond. Schedule C, where this machinery had been previously reported, has now been blacked out from the report.
As an aside, the personal property tax law changes also included a reporting repeal on all property previously reported on Schedule D1 (which is now blacked out), which covered exempt computer equipment and software (owned), cash registers and single function fax machines.
For limited construction enterprises that were classified as manufacturing already, please note that, because manufacturing machinery was already exempt from Wisconsin’s personal property tax, the changes will not have large affects on manufacturing company classifications.
For most of the State’s construction companies, this should have been considered in the annual filing; usually due in March. For items previously included on Schedule C: Machinery, your default position should have been to remove these items from the return (unless clearly misclassified in the past).
Opportunities
Going forward, construction companies should evaluate whether their property is required to be included elsewhere on the property tax return or is an otherwise exempt item. If this is not the case, evaluate whether the property meets the new definition of machinery and can be excluded. For items that you have reclassified to machinery on the January 1, 2018 return, the validity of this reclassification will ultimately be at the discretion of your local assessor. Local municipalities have already been scrutinizing the reporting done by construction companies. Therefore, in these early years following this legislative change, it will be important to make those reclassifications as future attempts to reclassify something to exempt machinery will likely be even more challenging.
The repeal of the Wisconsin personal property tax on non-manufacturing machinery, tools, and patterns will likely result in significant tax savings for all companies with offices in Wisconsin. It is important to review all schedules on Form PA-003 for exempt machinery, not just Schedule C. There may have been machinery previously reported on other schedules that is/are now exempt.
Other reminders
Don’t forget, effective for contracts entered into on July 1, 2018 or later, the exemption for products sold in relation to a real property construction contract with a tax-exempt entity is also expanded to include contracts with Wisconsin colleges and educational institutions. This comes from a windfall of administrative burden lifting dealt out from Act 59 last September.
In 2013, Wisconsin enacted a sales tax exemption for products sold by a contractor as part of a “lump-sum” contract for real property construction if the sales price assigned to the products was less than 10 percent of the total, lump-sum contract price. Effective for contracts entered into after December 1, 2017, this exemption has been expanded by Act 59 to apply to all real property construction contracts, whether or not they are quoted as a “lump sum. However, in order for the exemption to qualify, the total sales price of the products still must be less than 10 percent of the total contract price.
Act 59 also expands this exemption to apply to both prime contractors and their subcontractors. If a prime contractor qualifies for this exemption, then the prime contractor is still considered the consumer of the products and must pay the related sales/use tax. In addition, if a prime contractor qualifies for the exemption, then the sale of products by the subcontractor to the prime contractor are now also exempt if the total sales price of the taxable products is less than 10 percent of the total contract price. In those cases, the subcontractor is deemed to be the consumer of those products and must pay sales/use tax on them.
These recent state and local tax developments should help lower property tax assessments to contractors in this state. The developments should also lower the administrative time involved with passing through sales tax exempt material to the public sector.
By Ryan Gartmann, Principle CLA, CliftonLarsonAllen
The information contained herein is general in nature and is not intended, and should not be construed, as legal, accounting, investment or tax advice or opinion provided by the author to the reader. The reader also is cautioned that this material may not be applicable to, or suitable for, the reader’s specific circumstances or needs, and may require consideration of nontax and other tax factors if any action is to be contemplated. The reader should contact his or her tax professional prior to taking any action based upon this information. The author assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect the information contained herein.